News

Ham asks Judicial Service Commission to probe Principal Judge over DTB case

1 Mins read


Tycoon Hamis Kiggundu the CEO of Ham Enterprises has requested the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) to investigate Principal Judge Flavian Zeija’s conduct in his case against Diamond Trust Bank (DTB).

His petition which was received by JSC on Friday October 16, stems from Judge Flavian decision to order the stay of execution of the Commercial Court ruling in which Justice Henry Adonyo directed DTB to refund shs 120 billion to Hamis Kiggundu alias Ham.

“In conclusion, we request the commission to investigate the matter under article 147 of the constitution and section 27 of the Judicial service act together with the judicial service (complaints and disciplinary Proceedings) Regulation 2005. As there are several people with similar complaints,” part of Ham’s petition reads.

Ham said the way Flavian is handling his file is a “judicial misconduct” because of his unfair baised actions towards the businessman as he favours the bank.

“Since he is a former Banker, having served at Finca Uganda and Tropical Bank of Africa; his loyalty is inclined towards supporting banks against clients in courts of law taking advantage of his superior high-ranking position in the Judiciary.

This is evident from his misconduct with our file right from the start when we filed the plaint where on various occasions, to mention but a few very significant ones,” Ham suggested.

Flavian Zeija, the Principal Judge

He adds: “Without notice, he summoned the file when it was before the deputy registrar, Her Worship Dr. Agnes Nkonge, giving it direction in regard to our application for an injunction against the bank. As a fact, the final Extracted Order Subjecting us to a condition of paying 30% we received was divergent from the hearing proceedings before her worship and this left doubt in our minds to date.

He further summoned the deputy registrar, her worship Dr. Agnes Nkonge during the handling of Miscellaneous Application No. 34 of 2020 with knowledge of the defendants but without any notification to we the plaintiffs or our lawyers.”

Ham reasons that the actions of the principal judge not only have compromised the independence of the Judiciary but have equally seen him betray his oath to uphold justice, promote democratic principles, uphold the rule of law and safeguard the constitution through protection of human rights for all citizens of Uganda.

 

 

 



Source – Trumpet News

Power your brain with Ugandan News

Add some text to explain benefits of
subscripton on your services.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *